Carnival’s new milestone math has me curious
Replies
I actually prefer days sailed, at least as a baseline. A 14-day Alaska run and a 3-day hop out of Long Beach never felt equivalent from a loyalty standpoint, especially for people who spend a lot of time onboard using the ship the way it was intended. Number of cruises can reward short-hop frequency more than actual time at sea.
That said, on the casino side I think it gets murkier. Time onboard and casino value are not the same thing, so I could see loyalty and casino offers continuing to live on separate tracks. The new card designs are interesting too. Sometimes a card refresh is just cosmetic, sometimes it signals a bigger systems change behind the scenes.
I’m curious whether Carnival will make the milestone perks feel more meaningful, or if this is mostly cleaner math with nicer branding.
I kinda like days sailed for the regular loyalty side, mostly because it matches how a cruise actually feels. Denise and I can do two little weekend runs and it still doesn’t feel like one good 7-day out of New Orleans with sea days, steakhouse, and me donating politely at three-card. Number of cruises always had a punch-card sandwich shop vibe to it.
Casino side, I’d still expect its own lane. Ship loyalty is about time aboard; casino is a whole different gumbo. Anybody know if the new card redesign is just prettier plastic, or if folks onboard are seeing any backend changes yet?
I’m probably in the minority, but I think “days sailed” is easier for ordinary folks to understand. Gene used to joke that our little 4-day runs out of Canaveral padded the cruise count more than our longer ones ever did, and he wasn’t wrong. Days at least smooths that out.
What I’ll be watching is whether the onboard experience changes at all, or if this is mostly bookkeeping with a new card face. Sometimes these programs get renamed and re-measured, and for the average passenger it barely feels different. Has anybody actually sailed under the new setup yet?